home  | about us  | support us |  contact us  |  campaigns  |   links  |  news and press releases  | planning help |  publications and archives

CPRE East of England

www.cpreeast.org.uk

Robin Burkitt Alison Greenwood Straw bales in Norfolk

 

   

 

News and Press Releases

Bedford Ann Collett-White 01234 334564 NorfolkDavid Williams 01702 710232
Essex David Williams 01702 710232 Suffolk Simon Cairns, Director Suffolk Preservation Society 01787 247179
Herts Kevin Fitzgerald, (Director CPRE ). 01438 717587 Cambridge and Region Press Co-ordinator Ali Sargent 07776255193.
    Region Sean Traverse-Healy 01763 853843
Bluebells
photo by Chris Howe

27 July 2011

Planning system overhaul "damage" is feared

See this item is  from the BBC news website.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14287773

For more information and CPRE's view, go to www.cpre.org.uk/magazine/opinion/item/2369-planning-system-under-attack"

25 May 2011

Housing lottery – Local authorities play fast and loose with our countryside

Countryside campaigners are warning that many local authorities in the East of England are continuing to push forward plans for green-field housing. This is in spite of the Coalition removing the last Government’s shackles of regional housing numbers.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) East of England is demanding to know why many local authorities continue to allocate land for housing based on top-down imposed targets - numbers they are no longer obliged to stick to – that can only be met by ever more of our tranquil countryside being covered in concrete and tarmac.

Jeremy Hill, CPRE Regional Director, said: “It is clear that the straight-jacket of regional housing numbers simply was not sustainable. Now that it is up to local authorities to determine housing need in their area, we are relieved that many local authorities are choosing to look again to see how much housing is needed in their area and how this can be accommodated sustainably.

“Many local authorities have taken the only sensible decision – to reduce their housing numbers to a more realistic and sustainable level. Sadly others have decided to plough on with housing numbers that can only be met by destroying our countryside.” 

CPRE is calling on all local authorities to reconsider their housing numbers and to focus on regeneration and building on brown-field sites first; and only as a last as a last resort building on green-fields.


Letter published in The Economist 2 April 2011

Sir,

Regarding Britain, you suggested focusing on education in poorer parts of the country, but your real remedy for regional inequalities seemed to be  mass migration to the already heavily built-up south-east region.   Your call for an easing of planning restrictions in the south-east is a familiar refrain, much as politicians lambast civil servants or tabloids ridicule health and safety laws.  It ignores both the capacity of a given area to accommodate population sustainably and the very great success of the planning system in ensuring that people wish to live in all parts of the country.  Surely more thoughtful ways can be devised to help depressed areas than simply turning off the lights and shutting the door.

Press Release

18 JANUARY 2011

PYLONS:  WE NEED THE WHOLE PICTURE

Countryside campaigners are asking the National Grid to hold fire on its announcement on overhead power lines in the heart of Suffolk and Essex.  The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) in the eastern region says it’s crucial that the expert advice of engineers and energy consultants is taken into account before a decision is made.  Also, the Government consultation on new 400,000 volt electricity lines and pylons is due to end on Monday (24 January) but reports from the Institution of Engineering and the leading energy consultants KEMA on the cost and environmental impact of these high voltage cables will not be published until later this year.  The line is needed to connect new generators to the region’s electricity transmission system. 

“Only two months ago, the Energy Minister Charles Hendry welcomed these expert reports which he said would give a clearer picture of the relative costs and impacts of high voltage overhead lines compared with undergrounding," said CPRE’s Regional Director, Jeremy Hill, “So it takes a little understanding why the consultation period should end before they’re even published.  Changes to the planning system will weaken the guidelines for when and where these highly intrusive lines should be placed underground,” He continued.  “It’s crucial that any decision is fully informed.”

CPRE is calling on the Government to put back the end of its consultation period so the report can help make the Government, National Grid and all those involved, aware of the full facts.  By the same token, the campaigners are also asking the National Grid to delay its announcement of its preferred route for the new high power lines.

Thursday 24 June 2010

Affordable housing numbers up but success could be at risk from budget cuts, say rural campaigners

A recent report by the Homes and Communities Agency confirms that the East of England has seen a 20 percent increase on last year’s total number of housing completions funded via the National Affordable Housing Programme. Jeremy Hill, Regional Policy Officer for the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) in the East of England, said:

“CPRE has long been an advocate for well planed and situated development and the increase in affordable housing in the East of England is to be applauded. However, there is still a desperate shortage of affordable housing in the region – an area with some of the most expensive housing in the whole country. The average house price in the region in 2008 was Ł225,967 – still nearly 11 times average regional income. [1] 

“There remains a huge demand for affordable homes, particularly in rural areas. In these times of austerity and budget cuts CPRE is urging the government to remember this need and to keep funding rural affordable housing. Without this much needed funding, the cost of living in the East of England may prove too high for those who grow up here and want to remain in the countryside they love.”

Note to Editors:

  1. National Housing Federation Home Truths 2009 East of England – average regional income based on home address

 
Thursday 20 May 2010

THE END OF WESTMINSTER IMPOSED HOUSING – BUT WHAT WILL REPLACE IT?

In launching its plan for a ‘Big Society’ the new coalition government has confirmed that it will abolish Regional Spatial Strategies (essentially regional planning) and will return decision-making powers on housing and planning to local councils.

Jeremy Hill, Regional Policy Officer for the Campaign to Protect Rural England in the East of England, said:

“Over the last 10 years we have seen central government impose enormous targets for new homes to be built in the East of England – often overriding views of the people who live here and with seemingly limited regard for the environment. We welcome the new government’s commitment to abolish Regional Spatial Strategies and with it centrally imposed and undemocratic targets for house-building in the East of England.

At this stage it remains unclear what the new government intends to put in its place. The jury will be out until we see what they come up with but we do believe there is a need for strategic planning across local-authority boundaries to help coordinate – but not impose – development, infrastructure and services.

6 April 2010

TIME TO VOTE FOR OUR COUNTRYSIDE

The East of England’s new policy officer for the Campaign to Protect Rural England hit the ground running today by calling on all prospective candidates to sign up the CPRE's countryside manifesto.

Jeremy Hill, who has worked in property and as a city solicitor, highlighted the many threats being faced by the countryside:

I feel passionately about our beautiful countryside in the East of England. I am also very aware of the many threats it faces, from urban sprawl to pollution and climate change, and how we must rise to meet these challenges. Whoever wins the election must not be allowed to forget just how important our countryside is. That’s why all candidates should sign up to our Countryside Manifesto.”

The manifesto calls for government to

  • Support a good town and country planning system that is vital to protecting the countryside, guiding development and driving urban regeneration

  • Protect the Green Belt and resist pressure for urban sprawl

  • Protect and enhance the beauty and tranquility of the countryside. 

For more information or to arrange interviews:

Contact: Jeremy Hill, CPRE East of England: 01480 396697 or 07767 893358 

16 January 2009

GROWTH LEVELS “FRIGHTENING” 

Countryside campaigners say the new settlements in a study for the East of England Regional Assembly are unnecessary and would cause irreversible damage to the environment.  The new settlements study commissioned by EERA recommends major growth in Cambridge, Norwich and Chelmsford; more limited growth in Ipswich, Colchester and Bury St Edmunds plus up to six new settlements to meet Government targets for more than three quarters of a million new homes in the East of England by 2031.  

The Campaign to Protect Rural England says the region is pushing for unnecessary growth which would have a far-reaching and extremely damaging impact on the quality of life for those who live and work in the region.  CPRE’s regional planning advisor, Sean Traverse-Healy said the location of some of the settlements suggests the region is to be used as a giant dormitory for London commuters.  “If this is indeed the case, what are the benefits to the region?” he asked.  “If development is needed, it’s not just a question of coming up with a big number. It must meet the needs of people in the region, not just respond to an artificial Government-imposed target.”  

Mr Traverse-Healy says any new settlements will need services such as new roads, water, schools, hospitals, all of which will contribute to even greater loss and damage to the countryside. “Piling further growth on existing growth rates cannot be sustained without having an adverse impact on quality of life in the region. The report’s recommendations would lead to more pollution, more noise and more congestion.  The consequences are frightening and unnecessary,” said Mr Traverse-Healy.

For further information or to arrange interviews, please contact: Sean Traverse-Healy: Tel: 01763 853843, Mob: 07957 189558, or Ali Sargent, Tel: 01799 531599, Mob: 07776 255193

 

*The Campaign to Protect Rural England exists to promote the beauty, tranquillity and diversity of rural England by encouraging the sustainable use of land and other natural resources in town and country.

home  | about us  | support us |  contact us  | campaigns  |   links  |  news and press releases  | planning help |  publications & archives